Home

Advertisement

Nov. 5th, 2009


[info]tamilewisbrown in [info]thru_the_booth

Uncommon Sense- Author Debby Dahl Edwardson and her process


This week we’ve been talking about sensory detail in the Tollbooth. We’ve looked at language and craft; we’ve rolled lots of ideas around. Today we’re going to the source-  a writer who’s a master of sensory detail, Debby Dahl Edwardson- to learn how she approaches the subject.

Some of you may not be familiar with Debby or her work--- but you will be soon. Farrar, Straus and Giroux will release her stunning new novel Blessing’s Bead next week and writers and critics are already raving.

How about this-

“An outstanding novel.  Every young person and adult should read this page-turning look into the culture of the Iñupiaq Eskimos. It is both a compelling and an enriching tale.” —Jean Craighead George, author of the Newbery Medal Book Julie of the Wolves and the Newbery Honor Book My Side of the Mountain

or this

Blessing’s Bead is beautifully seen, glinting with Arctic light. It is also beautifully heard. Edwardson’s voice is as clear and fresh as a wind off the frozen sea. There are passages that simply take your breath away. —Tim Wynne-Jones, award-winning author of the Rex Zero books

Booklist gave Debby a star and one of the most stellar reviews I’ve ever read-

She “envelops readers in both the stark Arctic settings and the warm communities, past and present. Concrete and symbolic references to the transforming power of language, names, and stories link the two narratives...”

The release isn't until next week but my copy of Blessing's Bead came in to my local bookstore yesterday.  Debby's writing is meant to be savored but how could I resist? I've read it and it's gorgeous. But this weekend I'll take my time and read it again. It will be even better the second time around.

Naturally, I'm extra thrilled Debby could join me here in the Tollbooth to talk about how she works with sensory detail.

 


TLB- Hi Debby! Blessing’s Bead twines together two stories, both set in Alaska, one in 1989 the other in the early 1900’s.
Did you use sensory detail to give readers a concrete sense of what for many of us is an unfamiliar place?

DDE- Sensory detail is a powerful tool for us to use to add emotional meaning to a story—T. S. Elliot’s objective correlative and all. But it’s also a powerful tool for us as writers to use to get ourselves into a scene; to get into our characters.

Maybe I’m just weird, but I find that for some reason imaging the smell of something can bring me into a scene faster than anything else.

TLB- No, I don’t think that’s weird at all. It’s important. Helen Keller alluded to that in the quote I led off with on Monday. And Eudora Welty speaks vividly about smell’s power to summon memory in One Writer’s Beginnings. I think you’ve hit something important in how sensory detail can be useful to us at the creation stage. The power of smell will pull you as the writer into the dream of the story. Even more interesting, the memory of a smell can be incredibly evocative.

DDE- I usually have to edit a lot of this stuff out later, but it really helps me evoke a sense of being there if I can smell the pungent odor of a spruce tree or the fishy smell of the ocean, or the kid’s hair grease. Okay, that last one is from an historical 60’s era book and totally dates me…

When it comes to deciding which details to leave in an which to leave out, though, I really like that Janet Burroway quote you posted: "No amount of concrete detail will move us unless it also implicitly suggests meaning and value.”

TLB- That Burroway quote is our mantra this week!

DDE- This is a hard call sometimes. In terms of conveying a place that for many may be unfamiliar, I think all writers have to write as though they are seeing something that no one else has ever scene because in a sense that is always true. Even if it’s as familiar as a 7-Eleven the way you, through your character, are seeing it is brand new. If you happen to be writing from an unfamiliar cultural perspective, you are forced to consider this in depth, but my take is that every writer should consider it in depth.

TLB- Perhaps when you're writing from the point of view of a character experiencing a place or thing for the first time you have more leeway with sensory detail. They are, after all, taking it in along with the reader. A little league kid isn't going to go on and on about the smell of his baseball glove but a younger child just learning the game might.
 

 

DDE- Of course you are filtering this all through your perceiving character’s point of view, which for me meant that when I needed to convey the fact that it’s fall in the arctic and the ocean is starting to freeze, I had to think about how it might look to my character, who although Inupiaq is new to this very northern village:
"The waves are not pounding at the beach anymore. The waves have gotten too lazy to pound. The ocean is starting to freeze and the waves roll up and down real slow. The ocean is gray and icy, like a giant cup of Slushie somebody’s tilting back and forth. Pretty soon the ocean will freeze. That’s what Aaka says."
And in order to put yourself in a scene in a children's book you have to dig back into your own sensory memories and experiences as a child and then translate them to the context of the story you are writing:
"When we go bed the fall storm is blowing so loud it makes the windows of Aaka’s house rattle like a giant making popcorn somewhere close. Me and Isaac sleep in one bed, which Aaka says is ours. The wind pushes Aaka’s house back and forth on its pilings so hard I keep thinking we gonna fall off. Isaac puts his head under the blanket and lies real still. He’s scared.
It’s okay, I tell Isaac. It’s just like being on a boat. Right?

Isaac nods even though he’s never been on a boat before.
Feel how the waves are lifting us up and down?

Isaac nods again. Then he puts his head up on my pillow and shuts his eyes, satisfied. Could we go Disney Land on the boat? he whispers.
We could go anywhere on a boat, I tell him. We could go to a brand new world where the houses are made of cookies and the clouds are Cool Whip, I tell him.

Me and Mom used to pretend sometimes that we were on clouds made out of Cool Whip. Clouds that could move fast, way up high where only me and Mom could go.

What color is your cloud? Mom would whisper.
Butterscotch, I used to say. Butterscotch is my favorite color for a cloud.

But the clouds above Aaka’s village are not butterscotch-colored. Aaka’s clouds are gray as cigaaq smoke and the wind out there is ripping
them to pieces. I could hear it. This makes me think of Mom and Stephan again. When I close my eyes, I could even hear Mom’s voice in the wind: Run! Run away!


TLB- Butterscotch clouds. I LOVE that image. It conjures up taste as well as sight and it's so vivid. Also your contrast of the clouds at home and at her grandmother's house is masterful. 

Your novel is written in two voices- one a modern girl and the other her great grandmother who lived over a hundred years before. How did sensory detail help you distinguish their voices?

DDE- I think you separate the voices of any character not just by the way they speak, but by the details they notice, their own personal imagery. And of course when writing a historical voice you have to make sure that the details aren’t anachronistic. I wrote two race scenes in Blessing’s Bead, one historical and one contemporary. This is the historical voice:
When I finally glance southward, I see that he is running beside me, at a distance, like a dark shadow. Like the shadow of a bird, moving swiftly across the tundra, his running is even with my own. Our limbs move parallel to one another in a way that makes me feel as though we are connected, somehow. As though I am a bird and he is my shadow, gliding across the land.
We can assume that she is speaking in Inupiaq, and that she would notice direction because that is how it is/was and in the treeless tundra, you really do see the shadows of birds gliding across the land.

When I wrote a race scene for the contemporary girl, the details she notices and her own imagery is quite different from her great grandmother’s and is reflective of the “things” of her life:
The whistle blows and I take off, leaping into the race with one big jump. But Sylvia takes off even faster, shooting out ahead of me like a human bullet. For a second I want to sit right down and quit running because it feels like I already lost. Then I think about Sylvia and all her sister-cousins, snickering about my name, and suddenly it feels like my legs just got extra fuel. When we reach the turn around, Sylvia and I are neck-in-neck, way ahead of the all others. Right when we turn, she glances over at me and glares at me like she thinks she could make me trip just by looking. Then she starts running harder. Me too.
The historical voice, for example, would not talk use the figure of speech "got extra fuel…"

TLB- What a fascinating glimpse into your process Debby! I can't wait for next week, when you and Nancy Bo Flood will be here in the Tollbooth all week, guest posting about multi-cultural literature. Gear up, Debby. We'll be excited to read your posts all week next week.

DDE- Thanks for inviting me, Tami. What a fun conversation!

Debby's happy to answer your questions today, too. Just type them in the comment box.

But first, there's something I'd like to ask you. Debby uses evocative smells to pull herself into the dream of a story she's writing. What do you do to put yourself into that creative frame of mind?

iweb stats


~tlb


[info]theljstaff in [info]news

LiveJournal Major Notes: Spam counter-attack, RSS feeds again, CSI Deadly Intent contest



The empire strikes back

In recent weeks, we've taken huge steps towards blocking spam accounts on LiveJournal. In fact, we've suspended as many as 30,000 accounts in a single day! We've implemented several pre-emptive measures to prevent the creation of spam accounts, and we've honed our detection of suspicious content. Spam bots are a crafty lot, so we'll continue to refine our tactics and keep up the good fight to keep you safe from spam attacks on LiveJournal.

RSS feeds again

If you're addicted to [info]xkcd_rss, [info]icanhaschzbrgr, or other syndicated feeds, we're pleased to report that we've resolved the update error that was mucking up your RSS feeds. While content was being pulled correctly, it wasn't being posted to the feeds themselves. Late last week, we finally nailed down what we hope was the root problem, so content should post properly. We thank you for your patience.

Wii have killer CSI Deadly Intent contests!



[info]c_s_i

If you're a gamer who loves CSI, have Wii got news for you! [info]c_s_i is sponsoring killer contests. Simply post a question to a member of the CSI crew. The winner will get a free copy of CSI: Deadly Intent for Nintendo Wii (with a retail value of $39.99) and get their question answered by a member of the CSI writing team! There's also a fantastic monthly contest. To enter, join [info]c_s_i, play the online version of CSI: Deadly Intent, and respond to a two-part query for a chance to win a Wii! Entries will be judged on composition and originality. Sorry, but you must be a U.S. resident and over 18 years old to participate. Check out the rules here.

Enveloped in postcards

Last week, we asked you to send in postcards to help us decorate our drab concrete walls. Here's a photo of the results so far! Thank you so much and please keep them coming! You can mail them to Frank the Goat, Esq., c/o LiveJournal, Inc., 539 Bryant Street, Suite 210, San Francisco, CA 94107. Be sure to include your username, since we'll be giving ten random users paid account credits.



Photos of the week

If you haven't visited our new LiveJournal photo community, you're in for an amazing visual trip. LiveJournal users from around the world will take you on a scenic journey to everywhere. Post your own pictures or kick back and enjoy at [info]lj_photophile. You can view some of this week's awesome photos after the jump. Please start tagging with geographic location, since we'd like to track all the places around the world represented in this community. Keep on commenting too!
Read more... )

[info]tamilewisbrown in [info]thru_the_booth

Step Right Up! Five Amazing Senses On Every Page!



 
Writers get lots of advice, and I admit it, we spread it on pretty thick here at the Tollbooth.

Most writing tips are good. Some, especially some I learned in elementary school, are awful. Who could honestly believe it's a good idea to banish the word "said" from your writing? But here it is, in an amazingly wrong-headed and all too typical elementary school exercise called "Said Is Dead". The worksheet with 300 ways to replace said is really scary.
 

I'm sorry Mr. Said Is Dead-
Exclaimed is the Bearded Lady of Writing. Intriguing but unnatural. Weird, actually.
 
DO NOT FOLLOW THAT ADVICE. DO NOT EVER SAY "INTERJECTED". PLAIN OLD SAID WORKS GREAT.
Why? Said is invisible. Attributive phrases aren't the place to make your writing "unique".

So how does any of this relate to pumping up the sensory detail in your writing? Elementary school teachers (I don't mean to pick on you, teachers! I love you! I'm one of you! And you're not all guilty of this, not by a long shot-- but this is where I hear it most often) have another tidbit of writing advice, this time about sensory detail.

UNLUCKY RULE NUMBER 13-  Include references to every sense- touch, smell, taste, sound, and sight on EVERY PAGE. It will make your writing come ALIVE!

Yesterday Newport2Newport asked me if I was going to talk about that rule. As a matter of fact the strive for five rule is one of the reasons I started rethinking sensory detail in the first place. So yes, I am going to talk about it.

Here's what I have to say to anyone who advises you to have every one of the five senses represented on every couple pages-

"Drop the chalk and step back from the board before you hurt someone."

Smells, and tastes, and sounds stuffed into every single page can make your manuscript freakish.
 

 
"But," you say, "You've been urging me to use sensory detail all week! Now you tell me that adding sensory detail, just like my fourth grade teacher instructed, will turn my writing into some kind of sideshow oddity?" No. I'm not saying sensory detail is dead. But just like you shouldn't load your prose with a bunch of Hello, she sniffled or I hate you, he hissed you shouldn't pile a ton of sensory detail willy nilly onto every page. 

Get real. Real people do not notice every sound and smell. That would drive a real person crazy. If you're subjecting your reader to all that sensory overload it will drive them crazy, too. They'll shut out the noise by putting down your book.
 
 
Does this mean you limit yourself to one or two sensory details a page? No. What I'm trying to say is there are no "rules" here. Just remember what Janet Burroway said- "No amount of concrete detail will move us unless it also implicitly suggests meaning and value." Don't add sensory detail to strike a tally. Be sure what you put on the page has meaning and value and you're nearly home free.

As Kelly and I discussed in the comments to yesterday's post "One Thing Leads To Another." (I won't post The Fixx you tube video here. Find it yourself.) This leads us back to what we talked about earlier in the week. Find your own voice. Find your own balance. Sensory detail is powerful. Whether your writing is lush and uses a lot of it, or spare and leaves much to the reader's imagination is your choice and your style. But don't strive for five, just because that's what someone told you to do. Some pages may turn up references to every one of the five senses. Others may allude to only one. Or none. And both are absolutely fine as long as your work is well balanced and consistent. As long as it sounds like you.
 
Lets Go Hardcore


Now. Sit down. Grab a madeleine and pour yourself a cup of tea.

Ready?

Let's switch gears and kick it up a notch. Sensory detail for the impresario. A little hard to decipher at first but easy to apply once you understand.

Up front I confess I'm just barely learning about this myself and I'm not completely sure I can explain it well. But here goes. You can build sensory images, and use them on virtually every page, if you move away from conventional ways of describing the senses. No sniffing the air and picking up the smell of smoke on one page and scent of violets on the next, on and on until your reader aspirates on page 400.

In Dreaming By The Book, Elaine Scarry talks about the sense of touch. Conveying real substance and volume is, according to Scarry, one of the most difficult things in writing. We read a lot about the texture of an object when a character touches it but this is something else. It's giving your characters' surroundings genuine weight.

Scarry uses the example of Proust's writing in Swann's Way. (Bear with me here. I never expected to write about Proust or Swann's Way in a Tollbooth post, but here you have it... and I think it's worth it. So listen up. Nibble a madeleine. Relax.)

Proust uses something called "kinetic occlusion"- basically he describes the play of a (weightless) light from a lantern against a solid wall. This gives the wall real weight and texture. The flickering movement of one against the solid surface of the other creates a visceral sensation of actual substance. It makes the rocks in the wall read as a weighty objects. Heavy. Dense. Not just smooth or rough or cold or mossy. Kinetic occlusion makes the scene three dimensional- literally. If you don't believe me pull out your old copy of Remembrance of Things Past. Save a madeleine for me.

As soon as I read the Swann's Way example I was reminded of one of the most beautiful passages in all literature Something you may be familiar with, too---

        I was raised in a gaunt house with a garden; my earliest recollections are of floating lights in the apple-trees.
        I recall, in the orchard behind the house, orbs of flames rising through the black boughs and branches; they climbed, spiritous, and flickered out; my mother squeezed my hand with delight. We stood near the door of the ice-chamber.
        By the well, servants lit bubbles of gas on fire, clad in frockcoats of asbestos.
        Around the orchard and gardens stood a wall of some height, designed to repel the glance of idle curiosity and to keep us all from slipping away and running for freedom; though that, of course, I did not yet understand.
        How doth all that seeks to rise burn itself to nothing.

M.T. Anderson's The Astonishing Life of Octavian Nothing Traitor To the Nation Vol. 1 The Pox Party (p.3)

Does kinetic occlusion give this scene its substance? I'm not sure. I feel the weight of those boughs, the windy space between the branches. One way or other it's magic.  Word choice and rhythm, meaning and metaphor give it beauty and profound resonance. I may not be entirely clear about how kinetic occlusion works, but I know for a fact that this is sensory detail at its most incredible.

In the end, it's writing like this, not the rules of a well meaning teacher demanding we drop "said" and add loads of smells, or even a blogger who shoves fancy new terms down our throats that has the most to teach us about writing. Read and read and read and you will learn to write.

~tlb
 
Thanks Newport2Newport for suggesting I talk about the five senses per page rule. 

blogspot visitor
What writing rules do you think were made to be broken?

Nov. 4th, 2009


[info]tamilewisbrown in [info]thru_the_booth

The Language of Longing



The first question a novelist asks is WHAT DOES MY PROTAGONIST WANT? Lots of times it's the hardest question of all.

My former teacher Jane Resh Thomas was a master at probing a character's secret yearnings. She asks it this way-

What is your character's heart's desire? What is she dying for want of?

So what does your protagonist long for? And what does this have to do with sensory detail?

It's not enough for your character to say "I want a bike" or "I want to be popular" or "I want to be safe".  You as the novelist must show that longing in thought, word, and deed. You must reveal it in every gesture that character makes and in the essence of the world around him. How? Sensory detail.

Uh. Right. How does a character smell the desire to be popular?
 


Maybe she notices the popular girl's perfume, the smell of expensive leather boots... small sensations -- the jingle of car keys, the taste of a popular girl's favorite soda could remind her. But don't stop there. That's way too easy and way too obvious. How about the acid taste of bile that fills her mouth when the popular girl snubs her. How about the sound of silence when she finally turns the popular songs off her Ipod and goes back to reading a book she loved before she began her climb up the social ladder.

Sensory detail may be the most powerful tool in your writer's toolbox and the absence of a sight, smell, sound, taste, or touch is utterly

SUPERCHARGED.


I hadn't considered the power of absence until I recently spoke with Vermont College student Kelly Barson.
 


Each month first and second semester students in the MFA program write critical essays on craft topics they face in their work. Kelly wrote an excellent essay on sensory detail. After she shared it with me I invited her to join us here in the Tollbooth to talk about what she learned.

Hi Kelly! Let's get right to business. Which novels did you look at when you were studying sensory detail?

I examined Deborah Wile's novel Each Little Bird That Sings. Of course I read many other novels but this one stood out.

I'm smiling a really big smile. Debbie is a VCFA grad and former faculty member. Most of all a good and true friend and a marvelous writer. I adore her work, too. What did you find?

Wiles successfully uses concrete sensory details not only as description, but also to illuminate character and engage the reader.  An example of this is when the main character, Comfort Snowberger, escapes the pre- funeral commotion following her great-great-aunt’s death: 

"Everything in Aunt Florentine’s room sounded slow and soft. The floorboards breathed a creaky breath. The mantel clock gave off a satisfying tock-tick, tock-tick, tock-tick sound  that made the wallpaper roses look like they might nod off to sleep. Specks of dust drifted in the sifts of dusky light that came through the window blinds. The dust had no one to land on anymore; Great-great-aunt Florentine was gone. I breathed softly in and out on the bed and felt the loneliness of everything." (70)


That's gorgeous. And WOW doesn't that convey Comfort's longing for her Great-aunt Florentine! What else did you find?

Wiles also uses sound to convey emotion. “I heard Dismay’s toenails tap-tap-tapping down the hallway, coming my way” (87). Throughout the story, Comfort notes that sound several times. She portrays it as a happy sound, but other than that, this detail does not seem to be significant until the dog disappears in a flash flood and Comfort notices the absence of the sound. “I still woke up in the morning listening for Dismay’s tap-tap-tapping down the hallway, coming to get me up. That hadn’t changed” (242). The author need not mention that Comfort misses her dog; it is revealed by the sensory image (or lack thereof). Referencing the sound brings to mind previous instances of the dog’s being there, so the reader is able to remember and feel the emptiness as well. In fact, it may even trigger the reader’s past emotions of losing a pet, of remembering and missing.

WOW! WOW! WOW! I have to tell you when you first pointed out how Debbie uses the absence of sound I was awe-struck. Even though I'd read Each Little Bird The Sings a dozen times I never thought about how removing a sensory image that means happiness and fullfillment hammers Comfort's misery home... and yes it made me think of pets and people I've lost. Debbie shows us Comfort's heart's desire-- what she's dying for the lack of-- by taking Dismay's click click click away. It almost makes me cry just thinking about it.

Sensory detail seems so simple doesn't it? A smell here, a sound there... but studying it with greater depth has given me new respect. And sharpened the most important tool in my toolbox. Thanks, Kelly!

Do you have a favorite sensory image-- something that wrenches your emotions? Tell me about it!

iweb stats


~tlb





 

Nov. 3rd, 2009


[info]tamilewisbrown in [info]thru_the_booth

Not Too Hot, Not Too Cold... Just Right!



Yesterday I convinced you (I hope!) that sensory detail can be useful in your novel.

Today we'll talk about which details you should include and which you might ignore. In Writing Fiction, Janet Burroway said "No amount of concrete detail will move us unless it also implicitly suggests meaning and value."   Lots of times we talk about narrative like a movie camera, panning in and out. But as every photographer knows the camera captures details even the most observant eye skips over.


 
The day is sunny, There are four red balloons and three pink ones. Mom and Grandma clap. The cake is chocolaty sweet. The yard is lush. I could go on and on and on reporting every sensory impression recorded in this picture. But that would be a boring story. In fact, it wouldn't be a story at all. Most of that detail has no significance. In Burroway's terms it has no meaning or value.

How do we find detail with meaning and value?

In How Fiction Works James Wood describes two kinds of detail. Off duty and On duty. Both can be useful to a writer.

Off duty detail sets a scene and grounds the reader in a place. Lush writers like Alexandra Fuller use lots of sensory detail Wood would probably call "off duty".

"There is a hot breeze blowing through the window, the cold sinking night air shifting the heat of the day up. The breeze has trapped midday scents; the prevalent cloying of the leach field, the green soap which has spilled out from the laundry and landed on the patted-down red earth, the wood smoke from the fires that heat our water, the boiled-meat smell of dog food." Fuller,  Don't Let's Go To The Dogs Tonight, p. 5. 

This is Rhodesia in the mid 70's. Most readers haven't come within a thousand miles or a decade of this scene in their own lives, but through Fuller's use of sensory detail we experience the heat and the smells. We are engaged.

Then there's On Duty detail. Detail that doesn't just describe how something smells or tastes or looks. Sensations that also reflect emotion or theme. In the first chapter of Missing May, by Cynthia Rylant, the narrator, Summer, says her various foster families had always treated her like “a homework assignment”. Then when she goes home with May and Ob she finds a full larder-

“Whirligigs of Fire and Dreams, glistening Coke bottles and chocolate milk cartons to greet me.” p.8

This isn’t a story about Summer’s gluttony and the mention of these items is not there to make the house more real. These details are included to show how Summer’s life changed when she came to their house and why she misses May. It creates a subtext of happiness and plenty readers feel and believe much more keenly than if Rylant had said "May was a better foster parent than all the other families." Plus it's just more interesting to read.

Sarah Sullivan wrote about this sort of thing in the Tollbooth last June in a post titled Small Whitecaps and Wild Rugosa. Sarah described how in Olive Kitteridge, Elizabeth Strout portrays the sound of the tide rushing in over rocks. Sarah noted that the rumbling water reflects the point of view character's inner turbulence. Using sensory detail to reflect emotion and make the themes resonate through the work is called Objective Correlative. Go back to Sarah's post for a more detailed discussion. It's worth reading five or six or even ten times. Really. It's that good.

Whether to use on duty or off duty sensory detail- or maybe both- in your own writing is purely a matter of your own personal style. This is an essential element- in some ways the most essential element- of your own authorial voice. Writing that's rich with description, or spare with only the most essential detail, the way you strike that balance, is one of the major markers that will make your writing your own. There's no wrong or right way to do this as long as you approach sensory detail with intention and follow your own sensory beat.

Don't be a camera recording every single image you see, or smell, or hear in your fictional room. Be selective. Speak with your own voice. Open readers' senses through your own.

Then your writing won't be too hot or too cold. It will be just right.

 

Which books or writers do you turn to for wonderful examples or sensory detail? What sets their voice apart?
myspace analytics



~tlb




"
 

Nov. 2nd, 2009


[info]ljspotlight in [info]lj_spotlight

Spotlights: Homepage Spotlight 11/2/09

[info]aiyatheydidnt
The Chinese version of ONTD, AIYA is a dynamic international community that welcomes users who share a love of contemporary Chinese pop culture. Dedicated to celebrity gossip and entertainment news, you'll enjoy gorgeous photos and breaking stories featuring the glitterati of mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong.

[info]ljspotlight in [info]lj_spotlight

Spotlights: Homepage Spotlight 11/2/09

[info]wendylady2
Designed to rescue fashion victims everywhere, this Brit-based community reads like a rag-ezine. Published once or twice weekly, you'll view bizarre highlights of the global fashion scene through captivating photos and delightfully snarky editorial. Sit tight for a virtual fashion tour from the runways of New York to Milan to Paris and back home again to London in homage to the adage: you can't buy good taste.

[info]ljspotlight in [info]lj_spotlight

Spotlights: Homepage Spotlight 11/2/09

[info]soldiers_heart
A passionate community for veterans of all ages (mostly American), plus families, friends, and supporters. View poignant snapshots detailing life in combat and back on civilian soil in the form of original artwork, personal narratives, poetry, and photos. Be forewarned that members don't shy away from describing their disappointments, disabilities, and struggles.

[info]tamilewisbrown in [info]thru_the_booth

Let's Get Sensual


"Smell is a potent wizard that transports you across thousands of miles and all the years you have lived. The odors of fruits waft me to my southern home, to my childhood frolics in the peach orchard. Other odors, instantaneous and fleeting, cause my heart to dilate joyously or contract with remembered grief." Helen Keller

"Add sensory detail!" may be the most simple, and some would say obvious, command a writing teacher gives a student. But like everything else involving great writing it can be more complicated than that.

This week we'll explore sensory detail beyond the basics. How does the right sensory detail build voice? What effects can you create by describing smell, taste, touch, sound and the old standby what your point of view character sees? Do different readers perceive sensory detail differently? How do you avoid sensory overload?

Today let's start with why include sensory detail.
 

Janet Burroway, guru writing professor says ""Specific, definite, concrete, particular details--these are the life of fiction....(W)riting is alive because we do in fact live through our sense perceptions..." (From Writing Fiction A Guide To Narrative Craft)

Adding sensory details- the sites and sounds and smells are at the root of that other basic piece of writing advice- SHOW DON'T TELL. Put yourself in the point of view character's shoes. Bring him into the room and let him discover the smell of chalk on a chalkboard or a pan of  beans burned on a stove.

Let him hear a crying baby or a whimpering dog.

But this doesn't mean adding something like "Alfonso heard a mouse scurry under the table." That's still telling. Not horrible. Even okay sometimes. But that's not the best you can do. Try something like this-

"Alfonso dragged the chair from under the table and fell into its seat. A quiet gnawing, tiny claws across the floorboards, maybe, scurried from the dark corner beneath his feet. Alfonso pushed his plate to the middle of the table. He was never sure if he was alone in this kitchen." 

Okay, fine. I just made that example up on the spot. It's sort of silly and not the most elegant... but do you get my drift? Sensory detail shouldn't sit on top a scene like a cherry on a scoop of ice cream. Sensory detail that pulls a reader in is itself embedded into the scene. You are showing what sounds Alfonso heard, inserting those very sounds into your reader's ears, not merely reporting that there were sounds in the room.

Sensory detail is an arrow that shoots through a page, piercing a reader's heart and memory. How do you feel, suspecting there's a mouse under Alfonso's feet? Would you eat a slice of bread or a hunk of cheese from that kitchen? It probably doesn't matter to the plot of this imaginary story whether there are actually mice in the kitchen. It does matter that the kitchen has an unsettling atmosphere.
 

I constantly read tons of fiction, but lately I've been working my way through a hardcore work of nonfiction, too.


 

Dreaming By The Book by Elaine Scarry.
 

Scarry, a Harvard aesthetics professor, explains how reading creates an intense sensory response in the reader. In many ways- measurable with neurological and psychological tools- a reader's response to a story on the page is stronger than his reaction to dreams or imagination. Writers who use powerful description and compelling characterization create vivid worlds the reader believes in. How many times have you cried over a novel, even though the rational part of you knows it's all make believe?

One of the most essential tools of this world-building is concrete sensory detail. When Helen Keller read about the smell of a peach she was carried to another place and time. She fell into the dream of the story. You can do this too, with well written sensory details.

Tomorrow we'll talk about the what of sensory detail... making sure our literary smells and tastes are neither too hot nor too cold, but always just right.

joomla visitor


~tlb

Nov. 1st, 2009


[info]sarahsullivan in [info]thru_the_booth

Wishing You Happy Trails

This week I've been talking about finishing a novel, the trials, tribulations, doubts and (occasional) triumphs you may experience along the way. 

 

I try to

 

            avoid dead ends

 

and

 

            never lose faith

 

and

 

            stay in touch with the storyline and the inner life of my characters.

 

This last item is critical. In fact, it's what I'm focused on today.  When I look at my

work-in-progress, I need to ask myself if I really understand what's going on inside my main character's head through the last twenty pages of the novel.

 

You need somehow to separate yourself from the process of creation long enough to read the thing with an objective eye.  Okay. I know it is impossible to totally separate yourself from a story that came out of your own head, but you need to obtain as much distance as you can to judge if the story works.  

 

Here are some things to consider:

 

            1. Look at transitions. – Are there places in which the reader may wonder how the character has moved from the end of one chapter to the beginning of another?

 

            2. In the process of revising, have you perhaps, inadvertently, dropped a critical piece of information whose absence now creates a gaping hole? (This is where trusted readers provide invaluable assistance.)

 

            3. If you are happy with your work, send it out! (quickly, before that nasty inner voice start whining about something that is really okay.  Leave it alone. Let go!)

 

Thank you for reading this week. I wish you all a smooth ride to a happy ending!

 


Oct. 30th, 2009


[info]dwell in [info]lj_maintenance

Network Maintenance - Saturday, October 31, 2009 at 04:00-05:00 GMT/UTC

EDIT: If you're reading this, our maintenance is OVER! The problem was not found on our equipment, which means we'll have to work with our ISP to fix this small problem -- which also means another maintenance window in the future -- but at least we have eliminated our side.

Thank you everyone, and a special shout out to [info]rekoil for giving me a great suggestion AND also the opportunity to feel like I've just called in to a local radio station.

Have a great day, night or afternoon wherever you may be.

---

Hi everyone, sorry for the late notice but I'm going to have to do some testing on 1 of our 4 internet circuits TONIGHT; Friday night or Saturday morning depending on which time zone you're in.

Most of us shouldn't notice any impact, though there may be some slowness or lag when I switch traffic on to our other ISP circuits and then another hit when I stop the tests. If a page won't load or times out, try hitting refresh 1 or 2 times and it should load then. If it doesn't work at all... trust me, I'll be typing really really really fast to try to undo whatever I just did. Hopefully you'll have some Halloween candy (if you're in the USA and celebrate that kind of thing) nearby to take away the bitterness of a small site outage. :(

Here's the handy-dandy Website That I Always Use to get a feel for when the maintenance will start in your area. Our site traffic historically dips on Friday afternoons until Saturday morning which is why we tend to pick this time for maintenance work.

tech details )

status.livejournal.org will, of course be updated before and after the maintenance window. Or else [info]marta will get mad at me. :D

bt

[info]sarahsullivan in [info]thru_the_booth

BUMPY NIGHTS AND LETTING GO


Writing a novel requires a leap of faith. I mean, when you think about it, you have to wonder what would make a person undertake such an endeavor. When I think about it, visions of Bette Davis in the film, All About Eve, come to mind, that scene when she delivers that now-infamous line. Downing a martini and pausing on the stairs, she says:

 

"Fasten your seatbelts. It's going to be a bumpy night."

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eg-ckMup6SI&feature=related

 

Ah yes. Bumpy now and bumpier still as the journey proceeds. Who knows where it may lead.  

 

Part of the addiction of writing, (and I do believe it is an addiction), must be the fascination of seeing how the journey unfolds, of discovering where it takes you. 

 

I've already mentioned a couple of circuitous-path-to-completion stories. Here is another tale of the twists and turns behind the writing of a novel, a Newbery winner this time, one of my favorites, Walk Two Moons by Sharon Creech.

 

In her Newbery speech, Creech said that, before writing the final manuscript of what became, Walk Two Moons, she had written two earlier versions of the book, neither of which included Salamanca or the Hiddles. In an on-line discussion on CCBC-Net back in 1995, Creech said that the first version was a humorous sequel to Absolutely Normal Chaos. Mary Lou Finney was a central character in the plot. And look how that changed. 

 

Creech credits much of this change to finding a message in a fortune cookie at a Chinese restaurant. "Don't judge a man until you've walked two moons in his moccasins." Beneath the message, (Creech says in her Newbery speech), was the note, "American Indian proverb." Reading that message and the note which accompanied it, led Creech to remember a trip her family had taken across the United States from Ohio to Lewiston, Idaho in 1957. "...I remember it not only as a literal and physical journey across America," she writes, "but also as a metaphorical journey; it was a time when I was enriched and inspired by our vast country and all the various people who populate it. There was a larger, lush and complex world outside my own."  

 

 All of these thoughts swirled around in Creech's head and sent her off in a new direction. Salamanca Hiddle came into her story. And there was a girl named Phoebe Winterbottom. To fully appreciate this story-behind-the-story, I commend Creech's speech to you. It can be found in the July-August, 1995 issue of The Horn Book, or you may read it in a collection of Newbery and Caldecott speeches published by the American Library Association, The Newbery & Caldecott Books, 1986-2000. I cannot recommend this collection highly enough. There are riches here. Seeing the process through the eyes of another writer helps you understand your own process. I feel more comfortable about what's going on here on my own computer screen, when I learn about how others have encountered false leads and circled around and doubled back before completing a novel.  

 

Creech started out with a story about one main character. Then the main character changed and the story evolved and it became something very different from what she had first imagined. Last week, I deleted a character whom I had grown to love. I took him out completely. He no longer fits as the story has evolved. He now resides only in digital files labeled "previous drafts."  

 

All humans crave stories and perhaps writers crave stories about writing stories more than others. I don't know. What we're after is understanding. Or, at least, that's part of the quest. Fellow Tollboother Kelly Bingham reminded me yesterday in her note that, "at some point, you have to let it go." How right she is. I am thinking of that today as I struggle with the final pages of my manuscript. 

 

            Thanks, Kelly. I needed that.

           

What journey are you on now? What twists and turns have you taken along the way?

 

Is it time to let it go?

 

 

Happy Weekend everyone.. 

 

 

 

 

 

Oct. 29th, 2009


[info]sarahsullivan in [info]thru_the_booth

100 BEST BOOK BLOGS FOR KIDS, TWEENS AND TEENS

I'm taking time out for a special message:

We're celebrating here at The Tollbooth.  We received news earlier this week that our site has been included on the list at

"100 Best Book Blogs for Kids, Tweens, and Teens"

The list is broken down into eight categories from Picture Books and Younger Readers to Teens and Tweens and Young Adult to Well-Rounded Book Blogs to Multi-Cultural Book Blogs to Poetry to From and For the Professionals.... that's our category. There are also categories for Graphic Novels and Comic Books and Children's and Adult Literature. 

What a terrific resource. We're proud as punch to be included

 
Here's the link:


(
http://onlineschool.net/2009/10/27/100-best-book-blogs-for-kids-tweens-and-teens/).

 

 

Thank you to Amber Johnson for sending us this happy news!

                              

 



[info]theljstaff in [info]news

LiveJournal Major Notes: Search super-tweak, postcards, and amazing user content!



In response to user comments from last week, we want to let you know that we'll remain LJ cut-free for the next month in order to get more eyeballs on our evolving newsletter. As for product coverage, that continues to be our top priority. For more granular detail, however, we recommend you join [info]lj_releases.

Super-tweak for Yandex search

Some of our beta testers expressed privacy concerns using the Yandex search engine. Here's why: Last week, when you ran a search, you could see the usernames (and only the usernames) of everyone who commented on an entry, even if that entry was switched to Private or Friends Only after it was originally indexed. You could NOT see the actual comments from Friends Only or Private posts. In response to your input, we've implemented a fix to keep all user activity currently marked Friends Only or Private completely hidden. If you'd prefer your public content not to be indexed by Yandex, click here and use the settings labeled Search Inclusion (this covers your entire journal) and/or Comment Search Inclusion (which covers comments only). To test drive Yandex search now, click here.

Postcards from the edge

Several years ago, we asked LiveJournal users to send postcards to help us decorate our dull, white-washed offices. Since a good idea warrants repetition, we're at it again (same issue, new address). We hope you'll surround us with LiveJournal love by sending your postcards to Frank the Goat, Esq., c/o LiveJournal, Inc., 539 Bryant Street, Suite 210, San Francisco, CA 94107. We'll post snapshots right here. Be sure to include your username, since we'll randomly pick 10 lucky recipients to win free paid account time.

Conquer Writer's Block

Here are some excerpts from this week's most popular question of the day:

If a friend or relative makes a racist or homophobic remark, do you tend to confront them or let it slide? Are you more likely to confront them if it offends you directly or someone else who seems reluctant to speak up?
  1. I find it easier to stand up for other people, and i wouldn't let it slide if they made a rude or hurtful comment.
  2. Usually if a friend makes a racist or homophobic remark, I tend to let it slide. I think that while i would not say such things myself, I have no right to censor those around me.
  3. This happens all of the time. I confront some relatives, but I refuse to if they are drunk or watch Fox News.
  4. I'd let it slide if it was just a private remark... As much as I despise bigotry and intolerance, I know that you can't change people-they have to change themselves ...
  5. Confront! confront! confront! Politely, but without equivocation.
  6. SPEAK UP. Always, always, always speak up. Letting something slide lets ignorance win. No matter if it offends me directly, or someone else, I will confront the speaker and let them know that's not ok.
  7. I don't get offended personally. As an immigrant, woman, gay and person of color if I took every single potentially offensive remark seriously I wouldn't get anything done.
  8. I punch them in the balls. With my mind.
  9. I do speak up, but often very timidly because I feel that I'm white and therefore I don't really have any authority to lecture someone on what's racist and what isn't...
  10. Generally speaking, I do not let this shit fly, because it reduces me as a person, to this non-person and it replicates the destructive discourse that makes sure that sexual minorities, racial minorities, women, people with disabilities, trans people and every intersection thereof into something other than human... And sometimes... I'm just too tired to deal with it, so I roll my eyes, make a sarcastic remark and hope the conversation moves on quickly.
For more daily questions and user comments, join [info]writersblock. FYI, we don't want to invade your privacy, so we haven't credited individual users for their responses. We'd appreciate your feedback on this!

Spotlight community of the week

We can't resist making one last midnight trip to the ol' pumpkin patch. If you adore crazy costumes, fiendish festivities, and bottomless candy consumption as much as we do, this community has just what it takes to light up your jack-o-lantern.


[info]halloween_fan

Photos of the week

We received so many incredible photos, we had to close our eyes and point. We uploaded a selection of awesome images at our new [info]lj_photophile community. Please join and start posting (try to keep the width at around 625 for the sake of consistency)! We'd love for you to tell us more about your photos! You can help us select spotlight photos by commenting on your favorites. Once again, we thank you for making our online world more beautiful!




[info]shutter[info]pancetta[info]ilya_gorokhov


Curtains

Thanks, again, for tuning in. We look forward to seeing you next week.

[info]sarahsullivan in [info]thru_the_booth

WATCH OUT FOR THE POTHOLES


Today I'm going to look at some strategies for dealing with revision and moving a manuscript forward to the point of submission. DISCLAIMER first: These are simply small strategies that help me through the rough spots. They are by no means, THE STRATEGIES to use. In fact, if you have other suggestions, PLEASE feel free to share them! 

 

1. DEADLINES- Anyone who has ever written for a newspaper will tell you how useful the practice of writing to a deadline is. It teaches you discipline. It helps you get past all those little roadblocks in the way to typing your first sentence for the day. You have a deadline staring you in the face and so you must write. And somehow, miraculously, once you type that first sentence, the roadblock usually clears and the thoughts begin to flow. That inner voice that was clamoring CAN'T, CAN'T, CAN'T is silenced. 

 

So, give yourself a deadline. This will alter the way you think about the work. If you have all the time in the world to write, you will keep striving for perfection. I'm not saying this is a bad thing. I'm just saying it is potentially never-ending. It could go on FOREVER. 

 

I try to break my manuscript into manageable chunks and give myself goals for the week. As I move through successive revisions, the size of the chunks increases until I identify problem areas and focus on those. Somehow this makes the project feel more manageable. If I'm happy with the first fifty pages, I feel like I've accomplished something and it makes the work of fixing the second fifty pages feel more doable. 

 

When I was a student at Vermont College, Phyllis Root suggested making an agreement with a trusted friend to send her a chapter or so many pages every week. That way you have a deadline and, if you have a deadline, you will focus on polishing what you have right here and now and sending it out.

 

2. JOIN A WRITING GROUP AND READ YOUR WORK OUT LOUD – Have you ever noticed that it is only when you know you are considering how your work will sound to others that you honestly hear how it sounds? For some reason, each of us seems to have a little fairy godmother tucked inside who wrinkles up her nose and smiles when she hears bumps in a manuscript as if to say, don't worry, dearie. Nobody will noticeI can read a page out loud to myself countless times and never notice a glaring flaw in it. But, let me consider sharing it with a trusted listener and HORRORS! The little bump that my fairy godmother was willing to ignore has morphed into a giant pothole. 

 

The good news is that, by recognizing the problem, you not only have the opportunity to improve your manuscript, but, once you have fixed the problem, you develop more confidence in the quality of your work as a whole. 

 

3. REMIND YOURSELF THAT YOU WILL CONTINUE TO EDIT THE WORK EVEN IF IT SELLS – This is a tricky one. On the one hand, you only want to send out your very best work. So, please do not think I am suggesting you take the attitude, that's good enough. I'll fix it later. Far from it. I'm only saying that you don't necessarily need to feel that every single word of every sentence on every page is precisely the way it should always be, now and forever. AMEN. 

 

  

4. ALWAYS REMAIN OPEN TO POSSIBILITY. This is just good advice for life. It applies to writing and revision, just as it applies to ordering off the menu at a new restaurant. 

 

BON APPETIT! 

 

Now, back to work. . . .

Oct. 26th, 2009


[info]sarahsullivan in [info]thru_the_booth

IS IT SOUP YET? PONDERING THE CARROT SEED AND THE GREAT GATSBY


Faculty and alums of Vermont College's MFA in Writing for Children program(VCMFAWC) are familiar with a question frequently posed by one of our own. When a visiting writer comes to town, if Trent Reedy is in the room, he is likely to ask,

 

            "How do you know when you've finished a book?"

 

It's a great question. Does anybody know the answer? 

I'm sure I don't.

Lately I've been contemplating this question a lot. I have this uncomfortable

stirring inside which tells me that I am somewhere close to completion of the novel that I've been working on for . . . oh, I don't know. Let's just say, a LONG time.

Suffice it to say, that I'm trying to figure out when it's time to say, Uncle, or Eureka or Hallelujah or Oh, _ _ _ _ or whatever the appropriate exclamation may be and send the thing off.

 

Trusted readers have read it. They've made wonderful suggestions. I've revised and re-visioned and re-written in response to their thoughtful comments. I have shaped and trimmed and expanded and contracted and tightened and punched up and toned down and smoothed out until my poor little writing muscles are in tatters and shreds. 

 
Am I done yet?

 

Please tell me yes.

 

But, seriously, how do you know? 

 

That's what I'm going to talk about this week. And, believe me, I welcome all thoughts on this subject.   For one thing, I believe the answer is probably different for every writer. As if that doesn't complicate the subject enough, I also believe the answer probably differs from project to project. So, there you go. An impossible question. Are there any guidelines? It's a question worth pondering. 

 

I am reminded of the scene at the end of Michael Chabon's novel, Wonder Boys, in which the pages of the poor tortured writer's ridiculously long and apparently unfinishable novel go scattering to the four corners of the earth. Well, that is one way to end the misery. But, I can't help hoping for a different outcome.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sveK_fhIqhs  (NO.  This is not THAT scene.  It's a link to the trailer... also fun to watch.)

 Let's take a look at the bizarre and circuitous path some famous writers have taken to the finish line. Let's talk about how to know when it's time to throw caution to the wind and send that puppy out.

 One example of the odd twists and turns of the path to writing a novel comes from the experience of Josephine Humphreys whose novel Rich in Love is one of my favorites. I heard her speak shortly after the publication of her third novel, Fireman's Fair. That story, for those of you unfamiliar with the book, takes place in Charleston, South Carolina in the aftermath of a hurricane. The first sentence reads as follows,

 

    In his lawn chair under the Carolina sun, Rob Wyatt sat recuperating,keeping an eye on what was out there – his ruined island town, the blue yonder – as if recovery could be gained by the old southern method of sitting, mulling one's fate, watching things that don't move much.  

 

You see a theme already emerging, right? Notice those words ruin and recovery? And yet, get this, Humphreys did not put the hurricane in the book until after she had written the story and had it pretty well polished.  Hurricane Hugo came along well after she had started the book and so she added it to the manuscript. Et violà. Reading this novel, you cannot imagine the story sans hurricane. Take a look at these opening sentences from a review in School Library Journal:

YA-- The hurricane that devastated much of Charleston and its neighboring islands precipitates the action of this novel. The destruction it left becomes a metaphor for the chaos in the lives of Rob Wyatt, a 32-year-old lawyer who quits his job, and his friends and family who reside on the Isle of Palms."

 

And yet, it was not a hurricane which precipitated the writing of this book. So, you never know. You know? What if Humphreys had stopped working on the novel before the hurricane? What if the hurricane hadn't happened when it did?

 

Some scholars characterize F. Scott Fitzgerald's early story, Winter Dreams, as a warm-up exercise for his masterpiece, The Great Gatsby because of the similar themes and storylinesBoth works feature a young man of modest or limited means who falls in love with a golden girl from a privileged family.  The protagonist then longs to become a part of that glittering and unobtainable world. Of course, this is most likely an oversimplification of Fitzgerald's intentions, but still the similarities do suggest an artist obsessed by a certain story line or theme which he continued to explore in his work. 

 

Perhaps the most curious tale about the twists and turns in the path of writing concerns a book which, according to Anita Silvey's 100 Best Books for Children,  began as a "10,000-word saga" and ended up as a 101 word picture book. You guessed it. That's The Carrot Seed by Ruth Krauss. So, the next time you worry about cutting a chapter or a scene or even an entire character, think about that!

 

For today, let me end with a quote from Richard Brautigan collected in George Plimpton's The Writer's Chapbook in the chapter, "On Beginnings and Endings."

 

            "I always wanted to write a book that ended with the word mayonnaise."

 

Now there's one way to know when you've reached the end, although we still don't know the long and torturous path it might take to reach that word.

Until next time . . .


[info]ljspotlight in [info]lj_spotlight

Spotlights: Homepage Spotlight 10/26/09

[info]halloween_fan
Here at LiveJournal, we never balk at an opportunity for high drama, wicked costumes, and gluttonous sugar consumption. But this community takes it one step further: Here, everyday is Halloween. Of course, the hallowed eve is particularly sacred to this spirited crowd. If you're looking for last-minute costume ideas for your black cat, faux eyeball candy, or stand-out haunted houses, dive in for a splash of pagan merriment.

[info]ljspotlight in [info]lj_spotlight

Spotlights: Homepage Spotlight 10/26/09

[info]picturing_food
Designing gourmet? Feast your eyes on these pixel perfect dishes with an accent on presentation. A visual smorgasbord of eclectic cuisine, ranging from fusion to down-home comfort foods. If the way to your heart is through your stomach and the way to your stomach is through your eyes, you're sure to leave with a good taste in your mouth.

[info]ljspotlight in [info]lj_spotlight

Spotlights: Homepage Spotlight 10/26/09

[info]bookish
Passionate readers share well-penned reviews on a broad sweep of genres, including fiction, YA, sci-fi, paranormal, fantasy, and good ol' pot-boiling suspense. Those of a lit crit persuasion are invited to introduce themselves before posting. And for the silent majority who prefer to bask in our neighbors' labors, there are thoughtful reviews, book list suggestions, and even great gift ideas to keep your library card and dowtime filled.

Advertisement

Customize